Chess Cafe Articles
The ChessCafe.com website is worth a look each week, but this week's material was especially good. Just singling out the columns I found particularly interesting, there's
(1) The Endgame Study (#722, for those who read this after it's in the archives only). It's a very simple study with a humorous solution, so even study rookies can solve and appreciate it.
(2) From the Archives... (Efim Geller versus World Champions: A Tribute [Part 1]). Geller - one of a very, very, very few players with a plus score for his career against world champions (and he played dozens of games against them) - was one of the world's absolute best players from the early 1950s through the mid-to-late 70s, and he continued to be an important player and theoretician for years afterwards. Definitely a player whose games chess fans should be acquainted with.
(3) Boxing the Compass: This is a very long, week-by-week, review by Charles Riordan of the New England Nor'easters road to the US Chess League championship.
(4) The Openings Explained: Essentially a review article rehashing material discussed recently in New in Chess Yearbook 96 and on ChessPublishing.com about the 6.Be3 Ng4 Najdorf. (Technically, it's not an English Attack, as properly speaking that only arises after 6.Be3 e6, while 6.Be3 e5 is probably best labeled the Byrne Attack.) Of course, if you don't subscribe to either, then it's not a rehash!
(5) Checkpoint: It's a useful column to check out each month as Carsten Hansen reviews the latest batch of opening books. (Though why he keeps reviewing each issue of the New in Chess Yearbook is a mystery to me - it always gets four stars, and it's always the same sort of product. There is nothing new to say about it each time. [Of course I'm not as mystified as I should be: it's likely that that part of his column isn't really journalism; it's advertising. Still, it would be nice if he would just write "NICY issue X has just come out, and it lives up to its usual high standards. One interesting feature of this issue is {one-two sentence description}. If you're at all interested in keeping up with opening theory, this is as an excellent buy.])
Digression over. The reason this month's "Checkpoint" is noteworthy is that Hansen has discovered a book which makes Bruce Pandolfini's Chess Movies 1: Quick Tricks look like a work by Mark Dvoretsky. About a month and a half ago I referred to the Pandolfini book as possibly "the worst chess book I've ever seen". Well, I haven't seen Andrew Tocher's In Your Face Chess Novelties, but to judge by what Hansen has written and the book excerpts given there, there's a new contender for worst ever, and it would seem to be in a league all its own.
(6) Opening Lanes ("It's a Wonderful Life"): Finally, there's Gary Lane's reader-based openings column. I'm not usually too interested in the variations he covers (generally the readers ask about rather quirky sidelines), but I think the line he discusses this time around is useful. Club players often play rather junky and/or insipid lines, which they justify by expressing a fear or dislike for studying tons of theory. I think the fear is overblown, but the argument is in any case predicated on a false dilemma. There are many perfectly respectable lines that are sound, have a bite, and haven't worked out to move 30.
Case in point: the Motzko Attack against the Open Ruy: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Nxe4 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Bc5 and now 10.Qd3. The move is multi-functional: the queen keeps an eye on d5 (which it wouldn't after the main move, 10.Nbd2), makes Be3 possible, hits e4 and b5 (see Nbd2, a4) and may eventually hit h7 (Nbd2, the knights trade, and then Ng5). It clears d1 for a rook (more pressure against d5), and may also be a bit of a high-class waiting move. It's also comparatively unknown, which makes it a useful weapon in club play.
Does it promise an advantage? I don't know, but it's interesting enough that strong GMs like Andrei Sokolov, Leinier Dominguez, Vugar Gashimov, Nigel Short and Alexander Khalifman have tried it (against quality players!), as have "ordinary" GMs and mortals further down the food chain.