It's no longer a 3G network, but two of the Gs - Gelfand and Gashimov - survived. For Gashimov it was pretty easy, beating Caruana in the first two rapid games and drawing the third, but for Gelfand it was only in the 6th tiebreak game, the second in their blitz mini-match, that sufficed to knock off Vachier-Lagrave. As for the third G, Grischuk went down 2-0 to Jakovenko in their blitz mini-match.
As for the feel-good story of Wesley So, this chapter has come to an end, as Malakhov wiped him out 3-0 in the rapid games. Finally, in one of history's dullest matches, Bacrot forgot to draw the ending of their fourth rapid game, and was eliminated by Ponomariov. We can all wake up now.
Games of note: the first Caruana-Gashimov game was really wild, and my impression when I first saw it was that Gashimov had fallen into some amazingly deep tactical preparation. Impressively, Gashimov took the material, held on, and won. In the first Malakhov-So game, So looked outclassed, but he was right back in game two, pushing all the way. Unfortunately, he pushed a bit too hard and committed an act of chess hara-kiri.
All four blitz games (from Jakovenko-Grischuk and Gelfand-Vachier Lagrave) were very interesting. Starting with the first blitz round, Grischuk with White seemed to have the better deal: two weak black pawns to only one of his own, but somehow it was White's weaknesses that wound up being more significant. Meanwhile, Gelfand, with Black, had an extra pawn in return for significant suffering. It took him quite a while, but he finally overcame everything and could start trying to use his pawn - only to blunder with 46...Bc7+?? He was extremely fortunate that he could still draw after that, and it's a testament to his competitive character that he came back and won in the next game - and impressively too. As for Grischuk's second game, he was pressing hard and had some chances - only to fall comically into mate at the very end.
We're down to the final eight now - all from the countries of the former USSR! (Gelfand is not an exception: he has lived in Israel for about a decade, but he's from Belarus.) Here are the pairings:
Gelfand - Jakovenko
Mamedyarov - Karjakin
Gashimov - Ponomariov
Svidler - Malakhov
Who's the favorite? Mamedyarov has at least one advantage: he should be well-rested, as he hasn't had to play a single tiebreak! (Ironically, Akobian played twice as many games in the first round as Mamedyarov has the entire event.) Better still, he has had two days off, thanks to Laznicka's absurd 13-move draw. Gelfand is the top seed and highly experienced, and Svidler's résumé is just as impressive. Ponomariov can boast of having won one of these before - for the FIDE World Championship, no less. Karjakin was a semi-finalist back in 2007 and won one of this year's super-tournaments, so his credentials are pretty good too. Only Jakovenko and Malakhov are slight outsiders, but not much, especially since Jakovenko was rated as high as 2760 earlier this year. Whatever happens, let's just hope the chess is good!
(Games here.)
Sunday, December 6, 2009 at 11:04PM
A Cautionary Note to Parents of Chessplaying Kids
First, here's a link to a sad story about a well-known American chess teacher, recently apprehended in Belize. (HT: Brian Karen) This seems like a propitious occasion to quote some advice I offered four years ago, on the previous edition of the blog:
First of all, if you're a chess teacher, REFUSE to be the sole chaperone of ANY kids you didn't bring into the world. I have turned down several opportunities to earn some extra income by driving kid x to a tournament, and I simply won't do it. (I'm referring to driving a male child. All this gets raised exponentially if we're talking about a female student.) If the child is a minor, then even he's big enough to physically damage me, I'm not going anywhere with him in the absence of another adult, preferably one of his parents. Everyone stays out of trouble that way, and if you're a good teacher, you'll make plenty of money anyway.
Second, for parents: follow this same rule. If you can't bring your kid to a tournament, then he doesn't go. Or if he or she does go, this only happens when there are multiple adult chaperones, who do not stay in kids' rooms. In fact, I'd say that unless there's a medical emergency, no adult should ever be by him- or herself in a kid's room. Further, unless these chaperones have been investigated by the school district, forget about it. A freelance guy like me should NEVER be the chaperone, even if I'm with my wife, another chessplayer or instructor, whatever, if it involves situations where I could be out of the public eye with a child. (Part of a group, sure, as long as the group has some sort of worthy accreditation and, again, no one is ever alone with the kids.)
All this seems like common sense to me, just as (male) pastors should never counsel women behind closed doors, teachers should never be in an office with students of the opposite sex behind closed doors, etc. Instructors (or parents, if they take off work to take their kids) might lose a little money, and kids might miss out on opportunities to play every now and then, but that's life. Chess teachers won't have to worry about false rumors, and parents will have a lot less to worry about with their kids.