Candidates Tournament, Round 10: Carlsen Remains In Clear First After All Leaders Win
It's often Magnus Carlsen who turns up the "lucky" winner, but today he has grounds for annoyance if anyone does. He won a nice game with White in a Rossolimo Sicilian against Boris Gelfand. Maybe not a perfect game, but one that was clear and convincing. That assured him of remaining in clear first with four rounds remaining at the Candidates' tournament in London, but the margin is small.
Levon Aronian is just half a point back, thanks to another patented time trouble-induced suicide by Vassily Ivanchuk. Ivanchuk played the Budapest Defense and achieved a good game, but he played so slowly that he managed to lose on time making his 30th move. By then the position had been ruined, but while he had played too riskily given his time situation he was still objectively equal after Aronian's 28th move.
Vladimir Kramnik was also the recipient of a time trouble-induced gift. Alexander Grischuk went into the Berlin ending, and without being well-prepared. Kramnik enjoyed the very, very slightly better chances, but the game was headed for a draw when Kramnik played 27...Bf5. Objectively this is a terrible move, as it turned a slightly better position into one that would require almost a "miracle" (Kramnik's favorite word when his opponents save difficult positions against him) for him to hold - but only if Grischuk made the right decision on move 30. Grischuk was fully aware of the correct option, but happily for Kramnik thought that the move played, 30.Bxd4(??), was the simplest way to hold the draw. Unfortunately for him, it lost in elementary fashion (at least it's elementary when one has a little more time than Grischuk did to calculate things). The right move was 30.Ke3, after which Black must play very accurately not to lose! (In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if my analysis is flawed and Kramnik is losing that ending.)
Kramnik was rolling the dice, and given the tournament situation it was the right thing to do. His chances aren't very good a point behind with four rounds to play, but to catch up from a point and a half back would require a...miracle.
The fourth game was a bit embarrassing but understandable, a 21-move draw (by repetition, to avoid the tournament's 30-move rule) between Teimour Radjabov and Peter Svidler. Radjabov certainly could have played on, but in clear last place coming into the round he's clearly interested in putting this tournament behind him without suffering any further damage.
The games, with my notes, can be replayed here (and as ChessBase has deigned to fix their server you can finally see my analysis of the round 9 games as well).
Standings After Round 10:
1. Carlsen 7
2. Aronian 6.5
3. Kramnik 6
4-6. Gelfand, Grischuk, Svidler 4.5
7-8. Radjabov, Ivanchuk 3.5
Round 11 Pairings:
- Grischuk - Carlsen
- Kramnik - Radjabov
- Svidler - Aronian
- Ivanchuk - Gelfand
Reader Comments (4)
I'm surprised there hasn't been more public criticism of Ivanchuk, and his apparent lack of respect for the event or his fellow competitors. Marc Crowther seems right on the mark when he labels Ivanchuk's performance a "disgrace". Of course, good and bad fortune in an event like this is ineliminable, and part of what makes it such an exciting event to watch, especially live. But it's far from inconceivable that the challenger for the next world championship could end up being effectively decided by Ivanchuk's selective "suicide by opening / clock handling" decision-making. If he wasn't going to treat this event with the seriousness it deserves, he should have let someone else take his place.
I think in earlier interviews (at Gibraltar), Ivanchuk made it clear he was not very interested in the Candidates, so he was quite upfront about it.
[DM: My impression was a little different. I'd say he was trying to cultivate in himself a nonchalant attitude so he could avoid choking under the pressure.]
The Chessbase website says that the Budapest Gambit played in Round 10 was "possibly" the first time it'd been
played in a Candidates event or World Championship. For the record, it was actually played in the first game of Karpov-Short, 1992,
which Karpov won (after serious errors by both sides). Unfortunately for Karpov, he went on to lose the Candidates match though.
Short then defeated Timman in the Candidates final, and thus he qualfied to play Kasparov for the world championship........but then things got rather "muddled" in 1993 !
David McCarthy: Nakamura would have certainly brought good chess to the table.